Trying to Build a Mosque in the Country They Were Kicked Out of

Today, the Crimea is 13% Muslim, those Muslims being Tatars, its once dominant population, who have slowly returned following Stalin's mass deportation of their population in the 1940's.  Their attempt to build a mosque is being resisted by the local population; the New York Times reports:

Chunks of limestone, by the tens of thousands, are strewn in piles on a waterside lot here where one of Europe’s largest mosques is scheduled to rise. But the only soul around is a wizened caretaker in a tent, watching over what seems like another grandiose project gone bust with the financial crisis.

The trouble with the project, though, has nothing to do with money.

It is hinted at in the pieces of limestone themselves, many of which have been brought to the lot in protest and etched with the names of people who once lived here on the Crimean Peninsula, were deported by Stalin and never returned.

The mosque was supposed to signify the revival of those expelled, the Crimean Tatars, a Turkic ethnic group that suffered as wretched a fate as any under Communism. But with work held up by local authorities, the plan has instead stirred up a dispute involving politics, communal grievances, international tensions and historic traumas.

And so for the Crimean Tatars, the lot has become a site not for construction but for pilgrimages — and another reminder that here, as elsewhere across the former Soviet Union, the sins of the past will not be easily addressed.

“From each Muslim, one stone,” Refat Chubarov, a Tatar leader, said the other day as he offered an impromptu tour of the deserted lot.

Mr. Chubarov explained that for months, Tatars have been asked to deposit pieces of limestone on the lot, each costing less than a dollar, to demonstrate their displeasure. Thousands have done so, with many creating mini-memorials by embellishing the limestone with the names of long-dead relatives. The stones are generally 15 or 20 inches square and 7 inches deep.

The mosque, which is to have space for a few thousand worshipers, was approved in 2004 by local officials. They agreed on a prime location at 22 Yaltinskaya Street in Simferopol, the capital of Crimea, a peninsula in the Black Sea that is one of the most celebrated regions of the former Soviet Union.

The mosque project was to cost more than $10 million, most of which was to be paid by Turkish and other foreign donors, Mr. Chubarov said.

But in 2008, the Simferopol city council refused to grant final approval for the project, voicing concerns about its environmental impact because the site is near a reservoir. Officials said that traffic would overwhelm neighborhood streets and that noise from the mosque would bother patients at a nearby cancer hospital.

The city council, which is controlled by ethnic Russians, said its stance was not influenced by ethnic or religious hostility. It suggested other locations for the mosque.

“The mosque will be built, but only after taking into consideration the views of the public,” said Simferopol’s mayor, Gennady Babenko.

But Tatar leaders said they did not believe that the city would follow through on other sites. They said they doubted that the typical not-in-my-backyard complaints were genuine, asserting that local politicians simply did not want a prominent mosque in Simferopol.

“Everyone realizes that their opposition doesn’t make sense, because they had already given us permission,” Mr. Chubarov said. “Behind the scenes, they are saying: ‘Crimea is Russian Orthodox land. If they want to build a mosque, they should build it where no one can see it.’ “

The Tatars, who have inhabited Crimea for centuries, were deported in May 1944 by Stalin, who accused them of collaborating with the Nazis (some did, but most did not). The entire Tatar population, more than 200,000 people, was transported in brutal conditions thousands of miles away to Uzbekistan and other locations. Many died along the way or soon after arriving.

The Soviets confiscated their homes, destroying their mosques or treating them like warehouses. One was converted into a Museum of Atheism.

It was not until perestroika in the late 1980s that most of the Tatars were allowed back, a migration that continued after Ukraine became independent with the Soviet collapse in 1991. More than 250,000 Tatars now live in Crimea, about 13 percent of its population of 2 million people.

The Tatars’ return has repeatedly touched off legal clashes over restitution of land and property, much of which is now owned by ethnic Russians. Some have turned violent.

The situation is complicated by the political status of Crimea, which would generally prefer to secede from Ukraine and rejoin Russia. Crimea was transferred by Nikita S. Khrushchev, then the Soviet leader, to Ukraine in 1954, a move then thought to be a formality, since it remained in the Soviet Union and was populated mostly by ethnic Russians.

Tatars have better ties with the Ukrainian government, and are often seen by ethnic Russian nationalists in Crimea as Kiev’s proxies. The three sides jockey for power on the peninsula, and the mosque has been one focal point.

Tatar leaders maintain that the mosque is being blocked in part to stoke anti-Muslim and anti-Ukrainian sentiment, especially in advance of presidential elections in Ukraine, scheduled for January.

“There are many, many political forces that want the strains to remain,” said Mustafa Dzhemilyov, chairman of the Tatar legislative council. “I am referring to the Russian-speaking and Russian separatist organizations, which are supported by and fed by the government of Russia.”

Ethnic Russians in Crimea noted that Ukraine’s president, Viktor A. Yushchenko, has supported the mosque, accusing him of meddling in local affairs.

In the neighborhood around the project site, residents said the local government had the right to insist that the mosque be erected elsewhere — or not at all.

“Let’s remember that this is not Tatar land here, that the Russian people have always lived here,” said Larisa Tsybulskaya, 45, a beautician.

“My father built that house,” she said, gesturing to a nearby cluster of homes. “They are squatting on our land. Why do they have to cut all this land off and give it to one nationality for a mosque? It’s just shameful.”

But Mr. Chubarov, who is 52 and was born in exile in Uzbekistan, said Tatars would not relent.

He said the conflict had so united his community that more pieces of limestone had been brought to the lot than were needed for the mosque.

And so the extra material is to be used for homes for Tatars, in an effort to restore what was lost in Crimea 65 years ago.

Comments

[Finance Dissertation]

Blogs are so informative where we get lots of information on any topic. Nice job keep it up!!

[Mike]

Invasion and historical claims from goverments and societies log past should not be used as a justification to impose one self or community on another. Tarrable tradgies always happen and are best learned from not dewled upon. They should relocated the mosque a less contraveratal location. You do not change a river course by force overnight but, moved in incraments over time. This is the only way man has evoloved. Force (both physical and mentally) should be used sparingly or, the ones on the other side will become entrenched.

[MBA Dissertation]

Very informative and helpful. I was searching for this information but there are very limited resources. Thank you for providing this information.
Finance Dissertation Topics

[Finance Dissertation]

Trying to Build a Mosque in the Country They Were Kicked Out of <--
that's what i was looking for